5 man single elimination bracket
Dating > 5 man single elimination bracket
I wanted to know what you guys think the better format is. Personally, I think that double elimination is better, because in the end you know you get the best players. Even if you drop one bo3, you still have a chance to make it into the finals. There's many reasons that a player can drop the set and then they're out. I know some people will disagree and say that single elimination is fine since everyone has equal chances, or they are not as good as the player they faced or whatever reason. So let's hear some opinions. I prefer double elimination but it comes with the price of extended series which can lead to terrible finals and really anti climatic series. I think using single elimination but not having any best of 3's always 5 or more would avoid the rng factor of single elim with bo3 but not lead to elimiation series or the Homestory scenario where Naniwa actually beat Huk, only to then lose. Another thing i eliminaton have a problem with in double elimination is making the final fair. The method i like best is making the loser bracket player win the series twice. Seems fair to me that everyone else gets a second chance, why shouldnt the braciet bracket finalist? Never the less, double elimination, either way. On July 09 2011 16:36 blabber wrote: It's weird to have the winner of a elkmination lose a series earlier in the tournament. Double elim can also get confusing with different rules face an opponent you already beat 2-0 brackket you get an advantage etc. It seems like most sports use single elimination formats for tournaments, and almost certainly for their playoffs. The double elimination is just so messy; if one player loses early on but is successful 5 man single elimination bracket, he has to play a ton of games with little rest. Conversely the finalist from the upper bracket has a ton of rest, and has to lose two series in the finals. It just takes away a lot of the excitement. The finalists don't eliminatiion as two equals, one player nan in with too much of an advantage. There were several months of lead-up to this, and for someones season to end with a quick best of 3 seems too brief. With the amount of downtime shown in the first day of the finals, it feels like a best 5 man single elimination bracket 5 could have been fit into the schedule. While I understand they were probably 55 extra time to avoid running late, I doubt having such extended periods of non-action between matches was eliminqtion either.
Last updated
